2.3 The Caller Summary
LCS uses its own identity submap, caller, rather than the subject
record. Six of its seven audit events carry it.
It exists separately because LCS's events are emitted from a different subsystem with a different bound on what it will serialise. The two records overlap but are not interchangeable, and a consumer handling both needs to read each on its own terms.
| Key | Meaning |
|---|---|
effective_token_guid | The token the operation ran under. |
true_token_guid | The underlying token, where impersonation is in play. |
process_guid | The calling process. |
user_sid | The effective token's user SID. |
authentication_id | The logon session LUID. |
token_id | The token's own LUID. |
token_type | Primary or impersonation. |
impersonation_level | 0 for a primary token. |
integrity_level | The token's integrity RID. |
Nine fields, and no more. Group lists, privilege arrays, claims and default DACLs are unbounded and are never included — the same reasoning that shapes the subject record (§2.1), applied independently.
2.3.1 Against the subject record #
subject | caller | |
|---|---|---|
| Emitted by | KACS | LCS |
| Identity by | SIDs | GUIDs, plus user_sid |
| Groups | group_sids with attributes | absent |
| PIP state | pip_type, pip_trust | absent |
| Linux projection | projected_uid | absent |
| Session join key | auth_id | authentication_id |
Note the session join key is spelled differently in each. Correlating a
KACS event with an LCS event on the same logon session means matching
subject.auth_id against caller.authentication_id.